| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Saint Lazarus
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
195
   |
Posted - 2012.03.27 16:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Things I'd MUCH rather see first:
Shots/missles hitting ships
Damage type specfic explosions/impacts
Things impacting the shields around ship
Real hull damage
The new bombers
Eventually I'd like to see it..........just not all that pumped to see it, really wont make that big a diff...
|
Saint Lazarus
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
197
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 20:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:Saint Lazarus wrote:Things I'd MUCH rather see first:
Shots/missles hitting ships
Damage type specfic explosions/impacts
Things impacting the shields around ship
Real hull damage
The new bombers
Eventually I'd like to see it..........just not all that pumped to see it, really wont make that big a diff...
Chances are you are going to see all of that first in inferno. New tactical overlay is iconisitic, no ships no models and probaly no game engine animations. (think homeworlds)
Yea all that IF they dont get sidetracked
And I want that overlay to be ammmmazing, it could be a whole new way to play. See entire battlefield at a glance and gleam all the info you need.
ship types
incoming fire
distance
speed/direction of enemy fleet
Give that 5 man years of work, because representing all that without frying our brains is quite a task, graphically and artisically |
Saint Lazarus
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
198
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 21:10:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:The only reason this discussion even exists is because CCP management likes to be able to say that they gave the players the choice by posing us an obvious 'yes! or hell, yes!' question. Look how he players decided!
It's almost like saying the United States is a real democracy.
So we players get our say in something obvious like a graphics update, while way more crucial and sensitive matters, like how to handle dronepoo, are decided upon and basically set in stone, before we players even hear about it.
So basically you're saying "I havnt even discussed this with the people who dont want it"
Its pretty much a "We want those 5 man years spent on OTHER THINGS", there was other ideas thrown around that looked much MUCH better and more relevent to ACTUAL gameplay. |
| |
|